Reference:3009: Difference between revisions
| [checked revision] | [checked revision] |
Lint fix: replace ASCII triple-apostrophe ligne marks with proper prime characters (ligne-bold-bug) |
Fact correction: Boettcher's Prima ladder (myrolexpage.php) runs 15/18 jewels, so the 3009's 17-jewel grade does not sit on it; his enamel lettering test (blogenameldials.php) covers names added in paint, not the fired numerals and tracks; drop unsourced third-wheel-pivot warning found on no cited Boettcher page; restore Hodinkee (Forster 2021) quotation punctuation |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DISPLAYTITLE:Rolex 3009 Oyster Chronometre Scientific}} | |||
The 3009 is a manual-wind Oyster from the middle 1930s, built around a white vitreous enamel dial divided into three concentric tracks: hours on the inner ring, minutes outside them, and an outer scale graduated to fifths of a second, swept by a bright red centre seconds hand. The layout exists to be read quickly and read exactly. Nothing else on the dial competes with it. | The 3009 is a manual-wind Oyster from the middle 1930s, built around a white vitreous enamel dial divided into three concentric tracks: hours on the inner ring, minutes outside them, and an outer scale graduated to fifths of a second, swept by a bright red centre seconds hand. The layout exists to be read quickly and read exactly. Nothing else on the dial competes with it. | ||
| Line 85: | Line 86: | ||
The catalogues say "cal. 10½′′′" and stop there, which identifies a size rather than a movement. The bridge to an actual designation comes from two independent directions. Boettcher names it the Rolex calibre 700, describing an Aegler design that succeeded the earlier Rebberg movements and was known as the 10½-ligne Hunter. Bonhams reached the same identification from the other end, describing the Kew A reference 6210 as using "a 10-1/2 ligne 700 calibre base movement" recalibrated into the calibre 720. An independent researcher and an auction house arriving at the same identity from different evidence is about as firm as attribution gets for a movement Rolex never publicly named. | The catalogues say "cal. 10½′′′" and stop there, which identifies a size rather than a movement. The bridge to an actual designation comes from two independent directions. Boettcher names it the Rolex calibre 700, describing an Aegler design that succeeded the earlier Rebberg movements and was known as the 10½-ligne Hunter. Bonhams reached the same identification from the other end, describing the Kew A reference 6210 as using "a 10-1/2 ligne 700 calibre base movement" recalibrated into the calibre 720. An independent researcher and an auction house arriving at the same identity from different evidence is about as firm as attribution gets for a movement Rolex never publicly named. | ||
That base was not exclusive to Rolex. Aegler supplied it to Gruen as the calibres 825, 826 and 827, and Boettcher documents a Gruen 826 with indirect centre seconds. The same architecture | That base was not exclusive to Rolex. Aegler supplied it to Gruen as the calibres 825, 826 and 827, and Boettcher documents a Gruen 826 with indirect centre seconds. The same architecture and the same centre-seconds option sold under a different name on another continent. | ||
The 17-jewel and 18-jewel counts scattered across 3009 lots | The 17-jewel and 18-jewel counts scattered across 3009 lots are two grades of one calibre, but they do not sit neatly on Boettcher's ladder, which runs 15 jewels for Prima and 18 for both Extra Prima and Ultra Prima. The 17-jewel examples are the ones described with Superbalance and seven adjustments; the 18-jewel examples are the enamel Scientific dials. No documented source places a 17-jewel grade in the Prima sequence. The adjustment wording varies by house rather than by watch, and "timed to 6 positions", "adjusted to seven positions" and "adjusted in eight ways" should be read as cataloguing convention as much as specification. Boettcher also notes that "Timed 6 positions" and "For all climates" were later additions to bridge engraving, which makes the phrasing itself a rough dating aid. | ||
What those gradings bought was labour. Adjusting for poise and isochronism meant measuring a rate against a regulator over hours, and Boettcher records that in the 1920s and 1930s a minimum of four hours was needed to reveal a small difference, with observatory-standard adjustment running to weeks. The premium on a chronometer-grade movement of this era was mostly the cost of someone's time. | What those gradings bought was labour. Adjusting for poise and isochronism meant measuring a rate against a regulator over hours, and Boettcher records that in the 1920s and 1930s a minimum of four hours was needed to reveal a small difference, with observatory-standard adjustment running to weeks. The premium on a chronometer-grade movement of this era was mostly the cost of someone's time. | ||
| Line 95: | Line 96: | ||
The red seconds hand at the dial's centre is not driven from the going train. An extra wheel rides on an extended third-wheel arbor and drives the centre seconds pinion, an arrangement called indirect centre seconds. Taking the drive from the fourth wheel would give a cleaner 1:1 ratio and is the obvious engineering choice, but as Boettcher explains, it would also run the hand anticlockwise. Watchmakers on the NAWCC board confirm the constraint from practice, one stating flatly that a fourth-wheel arrangement "simply would not work." | The red seconds hand at the dial's centre is not driven from the going train. An extra wheel rides on an extended third-wheel arbor and drives the centre seconds pinion, an arrangement called indirect centre seconds. Taking the drive from the fourth wheel would give a cleaner 1:1 ratio and is the obvious engineering choice, but as Boettcher explains, it would also run the hand anticlockwise. Watchmakers on the NAWCC board confirm the constraint from practice, one stating flatly that a fourth-wheel arrangement "simply would not work." | ||
Because the seconds pinion sits outside the power flow, it flutters | Because the seconds pinion sits outside the power flow, it flutters. Backlash lets it kick back and forth with every impulse from the third wheel. The fix is a friction spring that damps the movement, and the fix has a cost. Jack Forster, writing in Hodinkee, puts it most sharply: the tension spring "adds a frictional load to the gear train and if it's not adjusted exactly correctly, you get reduced balance amplitude and therefore, a loss in precision, which is ironic since a center seconds is supposed to be an aid to reading off the seconds more precisely in the first place." | ||
The 3009 puts the seconds hand where it can be read against a fifths scale at a glance, and pays for the privilege in amplitude | The 3009 puts the seconds hand where it can be read against a fifths scale at a glance, and pays for the privilege in amplitude. | ||
==Dial map== | ==Dial map== | ||
| Line 122: | Line 123: | ||
The dials are vitreous enamel, not porcelain. Boettcher describes the process: a copper sheet cut to shape, coated in finely powdered glass, fired at around 800°C, and the process repeated several times, with numerals and tracks added in vitreous painting enamel and fired again. Once fired, vitreous enamel is, in his words, "invulnerable to ageing or fading." Period catalogue copy for these watches made the same claim in period language, describing a dial not susceptible to the normal deterioration caused by atmospheric conditions and time. For once the marketing was technically sound. | The dials are vitreous enamel, not porcelain. Boettcher describes the process: a copper sheet cut to shape, coated in finely powdered glass, fired at around 800°C, and the process repeated several times, with numerals and tracks added in vitreous painting enamel and fired again. Once fired, vitreous enamel is, in his words, "invulnerable to ageing or fading." Period catalogue copy for these watches made the same claim in period language, describing a dial not susceptible to the normal deterioration caused by atmospheric conditions and time. For once the marketing was technically sound. | ||
Cracks are a handling artefact, not a certificate of originality. A market argument circulates that hairlines prove an untouched watch. Boettcher's account points the other way: vitreous enamel cracks when the dial plate is flexed, typically by levering the dial off without fully releasing the dial screws, or by over-tightening the dial feet. The Christie's pink-gold example carries five separate cracks between 1 and 2, near 3, between 4 and 5, between 7 and 8, and between 10 and 11 o'clock. That is a service history, not a provenance. | Cracks are a handling artefact, not a certificate of originality. A market argument circulates that hairlines prove an untouched watch. Boettcher's account points the other way: vitreous enamel cracks when the dial plate is flexed, typically by levering the dial off without fully releasing the dial screws, or by over-tightening the dial feet. The Christie's pink-gold example carries five separate cracks between 1 and 2, near 3, between 4 and 5, between 7 and 8, and between 10 and 11 o'clock. That is a service history, not a provenance. | ||
Painted lettering, by contrast, should show wear. Boettcher separates the numerals and tracks, which go on in vitreous painting enamel and are fired into the dial, from names applied afterwards in enamel paint, which sticks poorly to the glassy fired surface and often wears badly or vanishes altogether. His authentication test follows from that: a painted name showing no ageing, chipping or flaking was probably added recently. On the 3009 the model words behave like paint rather than fired enamel. Christie's condition report records "a small loss of paint on the words 'chronometre' and 'scientific'," and Lacy Scott & Knight noted red enamel loss on a seconds hand. A Scientific dial whose two key words look crisp and perfect is the one to question. | |||
==Case, bezel, crystal, and crown== | ==Case, bezel, crystal, and crown== | ||
| Line 241: | Line 240: | ||
A caution on the record: two Lacy Scott & Knight entries describe an "automatic 18-jewel movement." The same entries also describe a seconds hand "powered indirectly from the movement with an extra train of wheels," which is an indirect-centre-seconds construction and incompatible with the automatic claim. It is one cataloguer's copy-paste across two sibling lots. No automatic 3009 exists in the record, and six houses describe the movement as manual. | A caution on the record: two Lacy Scott & Knight entries describe an "automatic 18-jewel movement." The same entries also describe a seconds hand "powered indirectly from the movement with an extra train of wheels," which is an indirect-centre-seconds construction and incompatible with the automatic claim. It is one cataloguer's copy-paste across two sibling lots. No automatic 3009 exists in the record, and six houses describe the movement as manual. | ||
== Related references == | |||
* [[Reference:2784|Oyster Junior Sport 2784]] — manual-wind Oyster of the same era | |||
* [[Reference:3003|Oyster Precision 3003]] | |||
* [[Reference:6541|Milgauss 6541]] — the later anti-magnetic answer to the same professional market | |||
See also the [[Reference:oyster-perpetual|Oyster Perpetual family index]], [[Reference:Movements|movement reference]], [[Reference:Bracelets|bracelet & clasp guide]], and [[Reference:Serial-numbers|serial numbers by year]]. | |||
== Sources == | == Sources == | ||
| Line 261: | Line 268: | ||
* [https://mb.nawcc.org/threads/indirect-centre-seconds-why-drive-off-the-third-wheel.96472/ NAWCC members including doug sinclair, "Indirect centre seconds — why drive off the third wheel? (NAWCC Message Board)", NAWCC, 2020-01-01] | * [https://mb.nawcc.org/threads/indirect-centre-seconds-why-drive-off-the-third-wheel.96472/ NAWCC members including doug sinclair, "Indirect centre seconds — why drive off the third wheel? (NAWCC Message Board)", NAWCC, 2020-01-01] | ||
* [https://mb.nawcc.org/threads/30s-rolex-oyster-questions.50364/ NAWCC members, "1930s Rolex Oyster questions (NAWCC Message Board)", NAWCC, 2015-01-01] | * [https://mb.nawcc.org/threads/30s-rolex-oyster-questions.50364/ NAWCC members, "1930s Rolex Oyster questions (NAWCC Message Board)", NAWCC, 2015-01-01] | ||
[[Category:Oyster]] | [[Category:Oyster]] | ||
Latest revision as of 04:27, 23 August 2026
The 3009 is a manual-wind Oyster from the middle 1930s, built around a white vitreous enamel dial divided into three concentric tracks: hours on the inner ring, minutes outside them, and an outer scale graduated to fifths of a second, swept by a bright red centre seconds hand. The layout exists to be read quickly and read exactly. Nothing else on the dial competes with it.
It is also one of the most frequently miscatalogued references in early Rolex. The 3009 appears on the community reference lists that circulate as the canonical Bubbleback roster, and Sotheby's has filed one under a "Bubbleback 'Flatback'" heading. The watch is neither. Every documented example is manual-wind, and the caseback is flat because there is no rotor to clear. Hodinkee's own Bubbleback survey shows a 3009 and says so directly, calling it "a 'flatback' with manual-wind movement" while noting that only a few examples have ever appeared for sale publicly.

Core facts
| detail | value |
|---|---|
| reference | 3009 |
| model designations | Oyster Chronometre "Scientific"; also catalogued as Oyster Royal, Observatory, and Oyster Chronometer |
| production | mid-1930s to mid-1940s; the only firm date anchor is a Glasgow import mark for 1937 |
| case diameter | 31mm across ten of twelve measured lots; single outliers at 30mm and 33mm |
| case thickness | 10mm |
| lug width | 17mm |
| case shape | tonneau / barrel |
| case construction | two-piece Oyster, screw-down back and crown |
| case materials | 9ct gold, 14K yellow gold, 18K yellow gold, 18K pink gold |
| crystal | acrylic |
| movement | 10½-ligne Aegler "Hunter", identified as Rolex calibre 700 |
| jewels | 17 or 18, tracking movement grade |
| adjustment | variously "timed to 6 positions", "adjusted to seven positions", "adjusted in eight ways" |
| seconds | indirect centre seconds, driven off an extended third-wheel arbor |
| dial | two-piece white vitreous enamel, three tracks, fifths-of-a-second outer scale |
| weight | 27.3g in 9ct gold |
Where it sits in the line
Reading the 3009 requires unlearning a modern habit. Today a Rolex reference number implies a model: 116500LN means Daytona. In the 1930s a reference number named a case, and the name on the dial was a separate marketing decision applied to it. Antiquorum stated the principle plainly when it catalogued the Mondani Collection in 2006, noting that reference 3116 "was marketed as the Royal, Viceroy, Imperial, Imperial Chronometer and Observatory Chronometer." Add the Asprey-retailed "Imperial Chronometre Scientific" 3116 that Bonhams later sold and one case reference carries six marketing names.
The 3009 behaves the same way. Across the auction record it appears as the Chronometre Scientific with its white enamel sector dial, as an Oyster Royal and Observatory with a champagne dial, as a plain two-tone silvered centre-seconds Oyster, and once with a California dial. Heritage catalogued a pink-gold example under a Speedking Precision heading while its own movement note read "Chronometer." So "Scientific" describes a dial, not a model line and not a movement grade.
Movement grade ran on a third axis entirely, and Rolex marked it on the movement rather than the dial. David Boettcher, working from surviving examples, sets out the ladder: Prima applied to 15-jewel movements timed in six positions, Extra Prima to 18-jewel movements carrying three additional jewels, and Ultra Prima also to 18-jewel movements, with the distinction between the top two grades unresolved. Above all of them sat observatory certification, and above that the Kew A certificate, which Bonhams records only 136 Rolex watches ever attained. Nothing about a Scientific dial guarantees where on that ladder any individual 3009 sits.

Production outline
Dating this reference honestly means admitting how little is fixed. Auction houses have assigned examples to circa 1930, circa 1935, circa 1937 and circa 1944, and those estimates do not reconcile against case numbers. The one hard anchor in the whole documented record is the Glasgow import mark for 1937 on case 37845, sold through Bonhams. British assay and import marks carry a compulsory date letter, which makes them the reliable dating instrument for pre-1948 Rolex in a way that catalogue estimates are not.
The case numbers that have surfaced cluster loosely: 5378/39218, 12818, 37791, 37840, 37845, 39069, 39250, 39251, 56568 and 278072. Movement numbers 10927, 10936 and 15204 run on their own sequence and cannot be mapped onto the case series. Two movements nine numbers apart sit in cases more than a thousand apart, so the temptation to read production volume from three data points is best resisted.
One pairing in that list is worth pausing on. Lacy Scott & Knight sold case 39251 in May 2025 and case 39250 four weeks later in June, both 9ct gold, both carrying a later engraved caseback monogram. Consecutive case numbers, matching later engraving and the same provincial English saleroom a month apart point to two watches delivered together, kept together for decades, and separated only at consignment.
Movement notes

The catalogues say "cal. 10½′′′" and stop there, which identifies a size rather than a movement. The bridge to an actual designation comes from two independent directions. Boettcher names it the Rolex calibre 700, describing an Aegler design that succeeded the earlier Rebberg movements and was known as the 10½-ligne Hunter. Bonhams reached the same identification from the other end, describing the Kew A reference 6210 as using "a 10-1/2 ligne 700 calibre base movement" recalibrated into the calibre 720. An independent researcher and an auction house arriving at the same identity from different evidence is about as firm as attribution gets for a movement Rolex never publicly named.
That base was not exclusive to Rolex. Aegler supplied it to Gruen as the calibres 825, 826 and 827, and Boettcher documents a Gruen 826 with indirect centre seconds. The same architecture and the same centre-seconds option sold under a different name on another continent.
The 17-jewel and 18-jewel counts scattered across 3009 lots are two grades of one calibre, but they do not sit neatly on Boettcher's ladder, which runs 15 jewels for Prima and 18 for both Extra Prima and Ultra Prima. The 17-jewel examples are the ones described with Superbalance and seven adjustments; the 18-jewel examples are the enamel Scientific dials. No documented source places a 17-jewel grade in the Prima sequence. The adjustment wording varies by house rather than by watch, and "timed to 6 positions", "adjusted to seven positions" and "adjusted in eight ways" should be read as cataloguing convention as much as specification. Boettcher also notes that "Timed 6 positions" and "For all climates" were later additions to bridge engraving, which makes the phrasing itself a rough dating aid.
What those gradings bought was labour. Adjusting for poise and isochronism meant measuring a rate against a regulator over hours, and Boettcher records that in the 1920s and 1930s a minimum of four hours was needed to reveal a small difference, with observatory-standard adjustment running to weeks. The premium on a chronometer-grade movement of this era was mostly the cost of someone's time.
Indirect centre seconds
The red seconds hand at the dial's centre is not driven from the going train. An extra wheel rides on an extended third-wheel arbor and drives the centre seconds pinion, an arrangement called indirect centre seconds. Taking the drive from the fourth wheel would give a cleaner 1:1 ratio and is the obvious engineering choice, but as Boettcher explains, it would also run the hand anticlockwise. Watchmakers on the NAWCC board confirm the constraint from practice, one stating flatly that a fourth-wheel arrangement "simply would not work."
Because the seconds pinion sits outside the power flow, it flutters. Backlash lets it kick back and forth with every impulse from the third wheel. The fix is a friction spring that damps the movement, and the fix has a cost. Jack Forster, writing in Hodinkee, puts it most sharply: the tension spring "adds a frictional load to the gear train and if it's not adjusted exactly correctly, you get reduced balance amplitude and therefore, a loss in precision, which is ironic since a center seconds is supposed to be an aid to reading off the seconds more precisely in the first place."
The 3009 puts the seconds hand where it can be read against a fifths scale at a glance, and pays for the privilege in amplitude.
Dial map

Five distinct dial configurations appear on the 3009 in the documented record.
The white enamel Scientific dial is the reference's signature and the reason it is collected. Antiquorum's Hong Kong catalogue gives the clearest description: "white enamel dial with inner Arabic numerals, tracks for hours and separate minutes, outer track calibrated for 5ths of a second, blued steel hour and minute hands, red central seconds hand." Auction houses consistently describe the dial as two-piece. A dealer account claiming the inner disc is fixed to the movement is unsupported elsewhere and contradicted by other descriptions, so the two-piece construction is documented while its mounting is not.




The remaining four are conventional by comparison: a champagne dial catalogued as Oyster Royal and Observatory, a restored two-tone silvered centre-seconds dial, a copper-coloured California dial with painted luminous Arabic and Roman numerals and baton indexes, and a silvered baton dial in pink gold. The California example is the outlier of the group, and a single lot does not establish it as a production configuration.
How the enamel dial is made

The dials are vitreous enamel, not porcelain. Boettcher describes the process: a copper sheet cut to shape, coated in finely powdered glass, fired at around 800°C, and the process repeated several times, with numerals and tracks added in vitreous painting enamel and fired again. Once fired, vitreous enamel is, in his words, "invulnerable to ageing or fading." Period catalogue copy for these watches made the same claim in period language, describing a dial not susceptible to the normal deterioration caused by atmospheric conditions and time. For once the marketing was technically sound.
Cracks are a handling artefact, not a certificate of originality. A market argument circulates that hairlines prove an untouched watch. Boettcher's account points the other way: vitreous enamel cracks when the dial plate is flexed, typically by levering the dial off without fully releasing the dial screws, or by over-tightening the dial feet. The Christie's pink-gold example carries five separate cracks between 1 and 2, near 3, between 4 and 5, between 7 and 8, and between 10 and 11 o'clock. That is a service history, not a provenance.
Painted lettering, by contrast, should show wear. Boettcher separates the numerals and tracks, which go on in vitreous painting enamel and are fired into the dial, from names applied afterwards in enamel paint, which sticks poorly to the glassy fired surface and often wears badly or vanishes altogether. His authentication test follows from that: a painted name showing no ageing, chipping or flaking was probably added recently. On the 3009 the model words behave like paint rather than fired enamel. Christie's condition report records "a small loss of paint on the words 'chronometre' and 'scientific'," and Lacy Scott & Knight noted red enamel loss on a seconds hand. A Scientific dial whose two key words look crisp and perfect is the one to question.
Case, bezel, crystal, and crown


The case is a two-piece tonneau Oyster with a screw-down back and screw-down crown, the waterproof construction Rolex had been building since 1926, here in precious metal rather than steel. No steel 3009 has surfaced in the documented lots; the record runs 9ct, 14K yellow, 18K yellow and 18K pink gold.

The reported diameters look inconsistent and mostly are not. Ten of twelve measured lots give 31mm, with one at 30mm and one at 33mm. A tonneau case has no single honest diameter: measured across the bezel, across the case band, or including the crown, the figure moves by a millimetre or two, which covers the entire spread. The clearest illustration comes from the sibling reference 2942, where one description gives 30.5mm without the crown and 32mm with it, in the same sentence. 31mm is the working figure. The 33mm Christie's example is the only one above 31 and is also the only 18K pink gold case in the group, so a genuinely larger variant cannot be ruled out on one lot, but neither can it be asserted.
Bracelets, end links, and clasps
Nothing on the 3009 is original below the case. The Antiquorum Hong Kong example arrived on a GEMEX integrated bracelet with a deployant clasp; another wore a 9ct Rolex riveted expandable bracelet stamped 4.67, dating the bracelet to 1967 and saying nothing about a watch head from the 1930s; a third came on a later leather strap. Eighty years of straps and bracelets have cycled through these watches, and a clasp code dates the bracelet alone.
One example retains something better than a bracelet. The 18ct gold indirect-centre-seconds watch sold at Dreweatts, case 37791, came with its original Manchester retailer's presentation box.
Retailer and provenance branches
Documented provenance on the 3009 is thin but not empty. One pink-gold example sold at Antiquorum in 2006 carries a caseback presentation engraving reading "Officers of the 107th Cavalry to Col. Woods King, Nov. 29. 1943." Woods King commanded the 107th Cavalry of the Ohio National Guard, which makes this the only 3009 in the record with named period ownership. The engraving records a presentation, not military issue.
Retailer signatures appear on the wider Scientific family more than on the 3009 itself. The Asprey-retailed Imperial Chronometre Scientific is a reference 3116, not a 3009. Among 3009s, only the Manchester box and, on the sibling 2942, an unnamed English retailer's dial signature have surfaced.
Auction record
Twelve lots with recoverable results or outcomes, across six houses.
| Sale | Date | Configuration | Case | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sotheby's, Hong Kong HK0206 | 27 Apr 2004 | pink gold, centre seconds | — | not sold |
| Antiquorum, New York 151 | 7 Dec 2006 | pink gold, brown dial, 17j; Woods King presentation | — | USD 3,776 |
| Bonhams, New York 15422 | 6 Dec 2007 | 9ct, restored two-tone silvered, 18j, 30mm | — | USD 1,080 |
| Antiquorum, Hong Kong 252 | 25 Jun 2011 | 9ct, champagne, Oyster Royal / Observatory, 17j | 37840 | HKD 35,000 |
| Antiquorum, New York 271 | 10 Apr 2013 | 14K yellow gold, California dial, 17j | 12818 | USD 2,500 |
| Dreweatts, Donnington Priory | 26 Mar 2015 | 18ct, enamel, indirect centre seconds, retailer box | 37791 | est. GBP 4,000–6,000 |
| Christie's, Swiss Icons | 8 May 2018 | 18K pink gold, white enamel, 33mm | — | est. USD 4,000–6,000 |
| Antiquorum, Hong Kong | 28 Apr 2019 | 9K, white enamel Scientific, 31mm | 39218 | HKD 42,500 |
| Bonhams, London 25397 | 10 Sep 2019 | 9K, enamel, Glasgow import mark 1937 | 37845 | withdrawn |
| Lacy Scott & Knight | 20 May 2025 | 9ct, white enamel Scientific, 31mm | 39251 | GBP 5,200 |
| Lacy Scott & Knight | 14 Jun 2025 | 9ct, white enamel Scientific | 39250 | GBP 4,000 |
| Sotheby's, Important Watches | 15 Jun 2026 | 18K yellow gold, enamel sector, circa 1937 | 39069 | est. USD 7,000–14,000 |
The white enamel Scientific dial commands a clear premium over the champagne and silvered configurations. The two Lacy Scott & Knight results, GBP 5,200 and GBP 4,000 for near-identical 9ct examples a month apart, are the cleanest read available on where the enamel dial sits in a general saleroom.
A caution on the record: two Lacy Scott & Knight entries describe an "automatic 18-jewel movement." The same entries also describe a seconds hand "powered indirectly from the movement with an extra train of wheels," which is an indirect-centre-seconds construction and incompatible with the automatic claim. It is one cataloguer's copy-paste across two sibling lots. No automatic 3009 exists in the record, and six houses describe the movement as manual.
Related references
- Oyster Junior Sport 2784 — manual-wind Oyster of the same era
- Oyster Precision 3003
- Milgauss 6541 — the later anti-magnetic answer to the same professional market
See also the Oyster Perpetual family index, movement reference, bracelet & clasp guide, and serial numbers by year.
Sources
- Christie's, "Christie's Watches Online: Swiss Icons, Lot 174 — Rolex 18K Oyster Chronometer Scientific with enamel dial, ref. 3009", Christie's, 2018-05-08
- Antiquorum, "Antiquorum Hong Kong, Lot 320 — Rolex ref. 3009, 9K Oyster Chronometer Scientific with enamel dial, mechanical", Antiquorum, 2019-04-28
- Bonhams, "Bonhams sale 25397, Lot 41 — Rolex 9K gold manual wind chronometer wristwatch, Oyster ref. 3009, Glasgow import mark for 1937", Bonhams, 2019-09-10
- Lacy Scott & Knight, "Lacy Scott & Knight, Lot 2595 — Rolex 9ct gold Oyster Chronometer Scientific, ref. 3009, case 39251", Lacy Scott & Knight, 2025-05-20
- Lacy Scott & Knight, "Lacy Scott & Knight, Lot 2150 — Rolex 9ct gold Oyster Chronometer Scientific, ref. 3009, case 39250", Lacy Scott & Knight, 2025-06-14
- Antiquorum, "Antiquorum Geneva, The Mondani Collection, Lot 108 — Rolex ref. 3116", Antiquorum, 2006-05-14
- Bonhams, "Bonhams sale 29155, Lot 19 — Rolex 18K gold Kew A manual wind wristwatch, Oyster Observatory Chronometer, ref. 6210, circa 1955", Bonhams, 2021-01-01
- David Boettcher, "Aegler, Fabrique Rebberg — vintagewatchstraps.com", vintagewatchstraps.com, 2026-03-31
- David Boettcher, "Prima, Extra Prima and Ultra Prima", vintagewatchstraps.com
- David Boettcher, "Enamel Dials — vintagewatchstraps.com", vintagewatchstraps.com, 2026-03-31
- David Boettcher, "Names on Dials — vintagewatchstraps.com", vintagewatchstraps.com, 2026-03-31
- David Boettcher, "About Watch Movements — vintagewatchstraps.com", vintagewatchstraps.com, 2026-03-31
- "Buying, Selling, & Collecting: The Rolex Bubbleback And Why It Still Matters", Hodinkee
- Jack Forster, "Center Seconds, Small Seconds, And Mechanical Fauxtina", Hodinkee, 2018-01-01
- James Mulvale, "Meet the Precursor of the Rolex Milgauss — the Rolex Scientific Chronometer", Waecce, 2023-01-01
- NAWCC members including doug sinclair, "Indirect centre seconds — why drive off the third wheel? (NAWCC Message Board)", NAWCC, 2020-01-01
- NAWCC members, "1930s Rolex Oyster questions (NAWCC Message Board)", NAWCC, 2015-01-01