Reference:3132 - Revision history

Admin: Resize hero: 340px -> 250px

2026-04-30T04:22:01Z

Resize hero: 340px -> 250px

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:22, 30 April 2026
Line 13:		Line 13:

	<small>[[Reference:bubbleback\|Bubbleback]] -> '''3132'''</small>		<small>[[Reference:bubbleback\|Bubbleback]] -> '''3132'''</small>
	[[File:Ref 3132 hero.webp\|thumb\|right\|~~340px~~\|alt=Rolex 3132 two-tone Bubbleback 1947 cream dial\|1947 two-tone, cream non-luminous dial]]		[[File:Ref 3132 hero.webp\|thumb\|right\|250px\|alt=Rolex 3132 two-tone Bubbleback 1947 cream dial\|1947 two-tone, cream non-luminous dial]]

	The 3132 is the sweep-seconds twin of the 3131. Introduced simultaneously in 1936, the two references share a case, a generation, and a position in Rolex history: the first Bubblebacks built on the two-piece Oyster case that would become the standard for every sport and dress Oyster that followed. What separates them is the second hand. The 3131 carried Cal. 620 with a subsidiary seconds register at 6 o'clock; the 3132 carried Cal. 630, the same base movement reworked to drive a centre sweep seconds. In 1936, that was the modern choice.		The 3132 is the sweep-seconds twin of the 3131. Introduced simultaneously in 1936, the two references share a case, a generation, and a position in Rolex history: the first Bubblebacks built on the two-piece Oyster case that would become the standard for every sport and dress Oyster that followed. What separates them is the second hand. The 3131 carried Cal. 620 with a subsidiary seconds register at 6 o'clock; the 3132 carried Cal. 630, the same base movement reworked to drive a centre sweep seconds. In 1936, that was the modern choice.

Admin: Audit: strip research-scaffold corpus tokens (surveyed corpus, auction-house corpus, consulted source) — reader-facing rephrase

2026-04-29T21:44:17Z

Audit: strip research-scaffold corpus tokens (surveyed corpus, auction-house corpus, consulted source) — reader-facing rephrase

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:44, 29 April 2026
Line 103:		Line 103:
	== Precious metals only ==		== Precious metals only ==

	The 3132 follows the 3131's materials policy exactly: precious metals only. No confirmed stainless steel examples appear in the surfaced auction or dealer record. Four case materials are documented across the ~~corpus~~.		The 3132 follows the 3131's materials policy exactly: precious metals only. No confirmed stainless steel examples appear in the surfaced auction or dealer record. Four case materials are documented across the auction record.

	14K yellow gold is the most common auction configuration. Pink-gold examples sit higher, and 18K pink gold with matching dial colour still marks the top of the market.		14K yellow gold is the most common auction configuration. Pink-gold examples sit higher, and 18K pink gold with matching dial colour still marks the top of the market.

Admin: SEO: og:image + image_alt + og_type + timestamps

2026-04-29T03:21:34Z

SEO: og:image + image_alt + og_type + timestamps

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:21, 29 April 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{#seo:		{{#seo:
	\|title=Rolex ~~Oyster Perpetual "~~Bubbleback~~" 3132~~ — BezelBase		\|title=Rolex 3132 Bubbleback — Production, Dial Variants, Serial Ranges \| BezelBase
	\|description=The 3132 is the sweep-seconds twin of the 3131. Introduced simultaneously in 1936, the two references share a case, a generation, and a position in Rolex…		\|description=The 3132 is the sweep-seconds twin of the 3131. Introduced simultaneously in 1936, the two references share a case, a generation, and a position in Rolex…
	\|keywords=Rolex, 3132, Bubbleback, specifications, reference guide		\|keywords=Rolex, 3132, Bubbleback, specifications, reference guide
Line 8:		Line 8:
	\|og_type=article		\|og_type=article
	\|published_time=2026-04-17T22:13:47Z		\|published_time=2026-04-17T22:13:47Z
	\|modified_time=2026-04-29T02:34:~~51Z~~		\|modified_time=2026-04-29T02:48:56Z
	\|robots=index,follow,max-image-preview:large		\|robots=index,follow,max-image-preview:large
	}}		}}

Admin: SEO: og:image + image_alt + og_type + timestamps

2026-04-29T02:48:56Z

SEO: og:image + image_alt + og_type + timestamps

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:48, 29 April 2026
Line 8:		Line 8:
	\|og_type=article		\|og_type=article
	\|published_time=2026-04-17T22:13:47Z		\|published_time=2026-04-17T22:13:47Z
	\|modified_time=2026-04-~~28T02~~:57:~~39Z~~		\|modified_time=2026-04-29T02:34:51Z
	\|robots=index,follow,max-image-preview:large		\|robots=index,follow,max-image-preview:large
	}}		}}

Admin: SEO: og:image + image_alt + og_type + timestamps

2026-04-29T02:34:51Z

SEO: og:image + image_alt + og_type + timestamps

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:34, 29 April 2026
Line 8:		Line 8:
	\|og_type=article		\|og_type=article
	\|published_time=2026-04-17T22:13:47Z		\|published_time=2026-04-17T22:13:47Z
	\|modified_time=2026-04-28T02:49:~~46Z~~		\|modified_time=2026-04-28T02:57:39Z
	\|robots=index,follow,max-image-preview:large		\|robots=index,follow,max-image-preview:large
	}}		}}

Admin: Relocate images: replace gallery with section-inline placement (5513 pattern)

2026-04-28T02:57:39Z

Relocate images: replace gallery with section-inline placement (5513 pattern)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:57, 28 April 2026
Line 62:		Line 62:
	== Where it sits in the line ==		== Where it sits in the line ==

			[[File:Ref 3132 full.webp\|thumb\|right\|250px\|alt=3132 SS rose gold salmon dial 1938\|1938 SS + rose gold, salmon dial]]
	The 3132 does not exist without the 3131, and the 3131 does not exist without the 3132. Rolex introduced the pair together in 1936 on a shared case platform, splitting the launch across two seconds layouts and two closely related movements. A buyer walking into a retailer in 1936 chose between sub-seconds and sweep-seconds in the same two-piece Oyster, in the same precious metals, at roughly comparable prices.		The 3132 does not exist without the 3131, and the 3131 does not exist without the 3132. Rolex introduced the pair together in 1936 on a shared case platform, splitting the launch across two seconds layouts and two closely related movements. A buyer walking into a retailer in 1936 chose between sub-seconds and sweep-seconds in the same two-piece Oyster, in the same precious metals, at roughly comparable prices.

Line 76:		Line 77:
	== The two-piece case, shared ==		== The two-piece case, shared ==

			[[File:Ref 3132 crown-detail.webp\|thumb\|right\|250px\|alt=3132 crown profile two-tone case\|Crown profile, two-tone case]]
	Case construction on the 3132 is identical to the 3131: a tonneau mid-case with integrated lugs turned from a single block, the bezel part of the mid-case rather than a separate ring, the caseback screwed directly into threads cut into the mid-case itself. Two pieces, the whole shell, appearing on this reference in 1936 alongside its subsidiary-seconds twin.		Case construction on the 3132 is identical to the 3131: a tonneau mid-case with integrated lugs turned from a single block, the bezel part of the mid-case rather than a separate ring, the caseback screwed directly into threads cut into the mid-case itself. Two pieces, the whole shell, appearing on this reference in 1936 alongside its subsidiary-seconds twin.

Line 119:		Line 121:
	== Dial and hand variants ==		== Dial and hand variants ==

			[[File:Ref 3132 dial-detail.webp\|thumb\|right\|250px\|alt=3132 cream dial close-up sub-seconds\|1947 cream non-luminous dial close-up, sub-seconds]]
	The 3132 dial corpus is narrower than the 3131's because the sweep seconds layout imposes a simpler dial. No subsidiary register at 6 means the lower half of the dial can carry a clean "Oyster Perpetual" signature without a counter interrupting the space. The result is a dial grammar that reads more modern than the 3131's, even though the two references are exact contemporaries.		The 3132 dial corpus is narrower than the 3131's because the sweep seconds layout imposes a simpler dial. No subsidiary register at 6 means the lower half of the dial can carry a clean "Oyster Perpetual" signature without a counter interrupting the space. The result is a dial grammar that reads more modern than the 3131's, even though the two references are exact contemporaries.

Line 158:		Line 161:

	Collectors divide by which configuration they prefer. Sub-seconds readers value the traditional dress-watch grammar of the 3131: the chapter ring, the subsidiary register, the smaller moving field. Sweep-seconds readers value the cleaner face of the 3132, the fuller Oyster Perpetual signature undisturbed by a counter at 6, and the engine-turned bezel option that gives the reference a distinct visual identity. The two configurations collect on their own terms.		Collectors divide by which configuration they prefer. Sub-seconds readers value the traditional dress-watch grammar of the 3131: the chapter ring, the subsidiary register, the smaller moving field. Sweep-seconds readers value the cleaner face of the 3132, the fuller Oyster Perpetual signature undisturbed by a counter at 6, and the engine-turned bezel option that gives the reference a distinct visual identity. The two configurations collect on their own terms.

	~~== Gallery ==~~
	~~<gallery mode="packed" widths="240">~~
	~~Ref 3132 full.webp\|1938 SS + rose gold, salmon dial~~
	~~Ref 3132 dial-detail.webp\|1947 cream non-luminous dial close-up~~
	~~Ref 3132 crown-detail.webp\|Crown profile, two-tone case~~
	~~</gallery>~~

	== Sources ==		== Sources ==

Admin: SEO: og:image + image_alt + og_type + timestamps

2026-04-28T02:52:59Z

SEO: og:image + image_alt + og_type + timestamps

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:52, 28 April 2026
Line 3:		Line 3:
	\|description=The 3132 is the sweep-seconds twin of the 3131. Introduced simultaneously in 1936, the two references share a case, a generation, and a position in Rolex…		\|description=The 3132 is the sweep-seconds twin of the 3131. Introduced simultaneously in 1936, the two references share a case, a generation, and a position in Rolex…
	\|keywords=Rolex, 3132, Bubbleback, specifications, reference guide		\|keywords=Rolex, 3132, Bubbleback, specifications, reference guide
			\|image=Ref 3132 hero.webp
			\|image_alt=Rolex 3132 two-tone Bubbleback 1947 cream dial
	\|type=article		\|type=article
			\|og_type=article
			\|published_time=2026-04-17T22:13:47Z
			\|modified_time=2026-04-28T02:49:46Z
			\|robots=index,follow,max-image-preview:large
	}}		}}

Admin: Add hero + gallery images for vintage Bubbleback/Oyster ref

2026-04-28T02:49:46Z

Add hero + gallery images for vintage Bubbleback/Oyster ref

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:49, 28 April 2026
Line 7:		Line 7:

	<small>[[Reference:bubbleback\|Bubbleback]] -> '''3132'''</small>		<small>[[Reference:bubbleback\|Bubbleback]] -> '''3132'''</small>
			[[File:Ref 3132 hero.webp\|thumb\|right\|340px\|alt=Rolex 3132 two-tone Bubbleback 1947 cream dial\|1947 two-tone, cream non-luminous dial]]

	The 3132 is the sweep-seconds twin of the 3131. Introduced simultaneously in 1936, the two references share a case, a generation, and a position in Rolex history: the first Bubblebacks built on the two-piece Oyster case that would become the standard for every sport and dress Oyster that followed. What separates them is the second hand. The 3131 carried Cal. 620 with a subsidiary seconds register at 6 o'clock; the 3132 carried Cal. 630, the same base movement reworked to drive a centre sweep seconds. In 1936, that was the modern choice.		The 3132 is the sweep-seconds twin of the 3131. Introduced simultaneously in 1936, the two references share a case, a generation, and a position in Rolex history: the first Bubblebacks built on the two-piece Oyster case that would become the standard for every sport and dress Oyster that followed. What separates them is the second hand. The 3131 carried Cal. 620 with a subsidiary seconds register at 6 o'clock; the 3132 carried Cal. 630, the same base movement reworked to drive a centre sweep seconds. In 1936, that was the modern choice.
Line 151:		Line 152:

	Collectors divide by which configuration they prefer. Sub-seconds readers value the traditional dress-watch grammar of the 3131: the chapter ring, the subsidiary register, the smaller moving field. Sweep-seconds readers value the cleaner face of the 3132, the fuller Oyster Perpetual signature undisturbed by a counter at 6, and the engine-turned bezel option that gives the reference a distinct visual identity. The two configurations collect on their own terms.		Collectors divide by which configuration they prefer. Sub-seconds readers value the traditional dress-watch grammar of the 3131: the chapter ring, the subsidiary register, the smaller moving field. Sweep-seconds readers value the cleaner face of the 3132, the fuller Oyster Perpetual signature undisturbed by a counter at 6, and the engine-turned bezel option that gives the reference a distinct visual identity. The two configurations collect on their own terms.

			== Gallery ==
			<gallery mode="packed" widths="240">
			Ref 3132 full.webp\|1938 SS + rose gold, salmon dial
			Ref 3132 dial-detail.webp\|1947 cream non-luminous dial close-up
			Ref 3132 crown-detail.webp\|Crown profile, two-tone case
			</gallery>

	== Sources ==		== Sources ==

Admin: Lexical slop sweep: filler adverbs, load-bearing, stands as, breadcrumb, register

2026-04-27T13:30:14Z

Lexical slop sweep: filler adverbs, load-bearing, stands as, breadcrumb, register

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:30, 27 April 2026
Line 6:		Line 6:
	}}		}}

	<small>[[Reference:bubbleback\|Bubbleback]] → '''3132'''</small>		<small>[[Reference:bubbleback\|Bubbleback]] -> '''3132'''</small>

	The 3132 is the sweep-seconds twin of the 3131. Introduced simultaneously in 1936, the two references share a case, a generation, and a position in Rolex history: the first Bubblebacks built on the two-piece Oyster case that would become the standard for every sport and dress Oyster that followed. What separates them is the second hand. The 3131 carried Cal. 620 with a subsidiary seconds register at 6 ~~o’clock~~; the 3132 carried Cal. 630, the same base movement reworked to drive a centre sweep seconds. In 1936, that was the modern choice.		The 3132 is the sweep-seconds twin of the 3131. Introduced simultaneously in 1936, the two references share a case, a generation, and a position in Rolex history: the first Bubblebacks built on the two-piece Oyster case that would become the standard for every sport and dress Oyster that followed. What separates them is the second hand. The 3131 carried Cal. 620 with a subsidiary seconds register at 6 o'clock; the 3132 carried Cal. 630, the same base movement reworked to drive a centre sweep seconds. In 1936, that was the modern choice.

	<span id="core-facts"></span>		<span id="core-facts"></span>
Line 43:		Line 43:
	\|-		\|-
	\| movement		\| movement
	\| Cal. 630 (~~9¾’’’~~, centre sweep seconds)		\| Cal. 630 (9¾''', centre sweep seconds)
	\|-		\|-
	\| companion reference		\| companion reference
Line 73:		Line 73:
	The consequences are the same as on the 3131. A thinner case than the earlier four-piece construction allowed, one fewer sealing surface to control in manufacturing, simpler service access, and lower production cost. The trade-off, where bezel damage and case damage become the same problem, was evidently acceptable to Rolex, because the company never reverted. Every Bubbleback after 1936 uses this construction, and so does every Submariner from 1953 forward, the GMT-Master, and the Datejust from the 4467 onward.		The consequences are the same as on the 3131. A thinner case than the earlier four-piece construction allowed, one fewer sealing surface to control in manufacturing, simpler service access, and lower production cost. The trade-off, where bezel damage and case damage become the same problem, was evidently acceptable to Rolex, because the company never reverted. Every Bubbleback after 1936 uses this construction, and so does every Submariner from 1953 forward, the GMT-Master, and the Datejust from the 4467 onward.

	What differs on the 3132, visually, is the bezel surface. A substantial subset of documented 3132 examples carry engine-turned bezels: finely machined radial knurling cut directly into the mid-case bezel ring. Engine turning is unusual for Bubblebacks of this era; smooth-bezel Bubblebacks dominate the surviving corpus. On the 3132, the proportion of engine-turned examples is high enough that it reads as a period-appropriate variant rather than a rarity. The Vintage Rolex Field ~~Manual’s~~ suffix system for the 3132 is organised around the engine-turned bezel: three of the four documented suffixes (/3, /7, /8) specify engine turning in their construction codes.		What differs on the 3132, visually, is the bezel surface. A substantial subset of documented 3132 examples carry engine-turned bezels: finely machined radial knurling cut directly into the mid-case bezel ring. Engine turning is unusual for Bubblebacks of this era; smooth-bezel Bubblebacks dominate the surviving corpus. On the 3132, the proportion of engine-turned examples is high enough that it reads as a period-appropriate variant rather than a rarity. The Vintage Rolex Field Manual's suffix system for the 3132 is organised around the engine-turned bezel: three of the four documented suffixes (/3, /7, /8) specify engine turning in their construction codes.

	<span id="dimensions"></span>		<span id="dimensions"></span>
Line 83:		Line 83:
	== Cal. 630 ==		== Cal. 630 ==

	Cal. 630 is the centre-seconds counterpart to Cal. 620. Same ~~9¾’’’~~ NA format, same 17 jewels, same 18,000 bph train, same roughly 40-hour power reserve, same 360-degree unidirectional rotor, same Super Balance, same Swiss lever escapement with Breguet overcoil hairspring. The architecture is shared, and so is the parentage. Cal. 630, like Cal. 620, was developed under Emile Borer at Aegler as part of the Perpetual program that began with the 1931–1933 patents.		Cal. 630 is the centre-seconds counterpart to Cal. 620. Same 9¾''' NA format, same 17 jewels, same 18,000 bph train, same roughly 40-hour power reserve, same 360-degree unidirectional rotor, same Super Balance, same Swiss lever escapement with Breguet overcoil hairspring. The architecture is shared, and so is the parentage. Cal. 630, like Cal. 620, was developed under Emile Borer at Aegler as part of the Perpetual program that began with the 1931–1933 patents.

	Cal. 630 reworks the motion works so the watch can carry center seconds instead of a subsidiary register. It keeps most of the 620 train but adds an indirect seconds drive. That is the practical movement change buyers are really looking at on the reference.		Cal. 630 reworks the motion works so the watch can carry center seconds instead of a subsidiary register. It keeps most of the 620 train but adds an indirect seconds drive. That is the practical movement change buyers are really looking at on the reference.
Line 94:		Line 94:
	== Precious metals only ==		== Precious metals only ==

	The 3132 follows the ~~3131’s~~ materials policy exactly: precious metals only. No confirmed stainless steel examples appear in the surfaced auction or dealer record. Four case materials are documented across the corpus.		The 3132 follows the 3131's materials policy exactly: precious metals only. No confirmed stainless steel examples appear in the surfaced auction or dealer record. Four case materials are documented across the corpus.

	14K yellow gold is the most common auction configuration. Pink-gold examples sit higher, and 18K pink gold with matching dial colour still marks the top of the market.		14K yellow gold is the most common auction configuration. Pink-gold examples sit higher, and 18K pink gold with matching dial colour still marks the top of the market.
Line 103:		Line 103:
	=== The suffix system ===		=== The suffix system ===

	Four 3132 suffix variants appear in the Vintage Rolex Field ~~Manual’s~~ Bubbleback chapter. 3132/0 is stainless steel, described as rare. 3132/3 covers the two-tone configurations (SSRG or SSYG) with an engine-turned bezel. 3132/7 is solid gold in rose or yellow with an engine-turned bezel, and 3132/8 is the alternate solid-gold code, typically yellow, also engine-turned.		Four 3132 suffix variants appear in the Vintage Rolex Field Manual's Bubbleback chapter. 3132/0 is stainless steel, described as rare. 3132/3 covers the two-tone configurations (SSRG or SSYG) with an engine-turned bezel. 3132/7 is solid gold in rose or yellow with an engine-turned bezel, and 3132/8 is the alternate solid-gold code, typically yellow, also engine-turned.

	Three of the four specify engine turning, a concentration unusual within the Bubbleback family where smooth bezels dominate. The suffix codes were used internally by Rolex on parts documentation c.1933–1953 but were almost never engraved on casebacks. Most surviving 3132 casebacks carry only the bare four-digit ~~“3132”~~ reference. The suffix must be inferred from the bezel style, case material, and hallmarks rather than read directly off the case.		Three of the four specify engine turning, a concentration unusual within the Bubbleback family where smooth bezels dominate. The suffix codes were used internally by Rolex on parts documentation c.1933–1953 but were almost never engraved on casebacks. Most surviving 3132 casebacks carry only the bare four-digit "3132" reference. The suffix must be inferred from the bezel style, case material, and hallmarks rather than read directly off the case.

	A catalog inconsistency worth noting: some Vintage Rolex Field Manual listings describe 3132 suffix variants with subsidiary seconds at 6 ~~o’clock~~. This is mechanically inconsistent with Cal. 630, which is a centre-sweep movement by definition. The most plausible explanation is a conflation with the sibling 3131 in the secondary listings rather than a genuine 3132 variant. The ~~reference’s~~ defining feature, centre sweep seconds, is the feature that separates it from the 3131 in the first place.		A catalog inconsistency worth noting: some Vintage Rolex Field Manual listings describe 3132 suffix variants with subsidiary seconds at 6 o'clock. This is mechanically inconsistent with Cal. 630, which is a centre-sweep movement by definition. The most plausible explanation is a conflation with the sibling 3131 in the secondary listings rather than a genuine 3132 variant. The reference's defining feature, centre sweep seconds, is the feature that separates it from the 3131 in the first place.

	<span id="dial-and-hand-variants"></span>		<span id="dial-and-hand-variants"></span>
	== Dial and hand variants ==		== Dial and hand variants ==

	The 3132 dial corpus is narrower than the ~~3131’s~~ because the sweep seconds layout imposes a simpler dial. No subsidiary register at 6 means the lower half of the dial can carry a clean ~~“Oyster Perpetual”~~ signature without a counter interrupting the space. The result is a dial grammar that reads more modern than the ~~3131’s~~, even though the two references are exact contemporaries.		The 3132 dial corpus is narrower than the 3131's because the sweep seconds layout imposes a simpler dial. No subsidiary register at 6 means the lower half of the dial can carry a clean "Oyster Perpetual" signature without a counter interrupting the space. The result is a dial grammar that reads more modern than the 3131's, even though the two references are exact contemporaries.

	Silvered and cream/ivory dials dominate the documented 3132 corpus. Champagne dials appear on yellow gold cases, typically with applied gold Arabic numerals or baton markers. Salmon and pink dials track the precious-metal convention: pink gold cases paired with tonal pink dials, yellow gold cases paired with champagne or cream. Textured grené finishes (the lightly grained or hammered background seen on well-preserved 3131 dials) appear on 3132 examples as well and remain one of the strongest indicators of an original unrestored dial versus a refinish.		Silvered and cream/ivory dials dominate the documented 3132 corpus. Champagne dials appear on yellow gold cases, typically with applied gold Arabic numerals or baton markers. Salmon and pink dials track the precious-metal convention: pink gold cases paired with tonal pink dials, yellow gold cases paired with champagne or cream. Textured grené finishes (the lightly grained or hammered background seen on well-preserved 3131 dials) appear on 3132 examples as well and remain one of the strongest indicators of an original unrestored dial versus a refinish.

	Serpico y Laino co-signed dials are documented on 3132s sold through the Venezuelan ~~retailer’s~~ network in the late 1930s and 1940s. Like other retailer-signed Rolex dials from this period (Cuervo y Sobrinos, Bucherer, Gobbi), a Serpico y Laino signature carries a collector premium in proportion to its authenticity and condition. Refinished Serpico y Laino dials are common; genuine period-original co-signed dials are scarce and verify via lettering consistency with other documented examples rather than via paperwork, which rarely survives.		Serpico y Laino co-signed dials are documented on 3132s sold through the Venezuelan retailer's network in the late 1930s and 1940s. Like other retailer-signed Rolex dials from this period (Cuervo y Sobrinos, Bucherer, Gobbi), a Serpico y Laino signature carries a collector premium in proportion to its authenticity and condition. Refinished Serpico y Laino dials are common; genuine period-original co-signed dials are scarce and verify via lettering consistency with other documented examples rather than via paperwork, which rarely survives.

	Hand configurations follow the 3131 catalog. Luminous pencil hands with radium fill are the most common; feuille (leaf) hands appear on formal silvered-dial examples; spade hands are scarce and typically appear on early-production pre-1940 cases. Dauphine hands, which become dominant on later 1940s Bubblebacks, are period-plausible on late 3132 examples but appear less frequently than pencil hands in the surfaced corpus.		Hand configurations follow the 3131 catalog. Luminous pencil hands with radium fill are the most common; feuille (leaf) hands appear on formal silvered-dial examples; spade hands are scarce and typically appear on early-production pre-1940 cases. Dauphine hands, which become dominant on later 1940s Bubblebacks, are period-plausible on late 3132 examples but appear less frequently than pencil hands in the surfaced corpus.
Line 127:		Line 127:
	The market framework is clear enough even if the record is thin. Standard 14k examples sit close to the 3131 baseline, pink-gold examples sit at the top of the range, and engine-turned bezel variants usually add a modest premium over smooth-bezel watches.		The market framework is clear enough even if the record is thin. Standard 14k examples sit close to the 3131 baseline, pink-gold examples sit at the top of the range, and engine-turned bezel variants usually add a modest premium over smooth-bezel watches.

	Serpico y Laino co-signed 3132s with verified authenticity and strong original dial condition represent the top end of the ~~reference’s~~ market, with auction results for comparable co-signed vintage Bubblebacks reaching into the USD 15,000–25,000 range when hammered.		Serpico y Laino co-signed 3132s with verified authenticity and strong original dial condition represent the top end of the reference's market, with auction results for comparable co-signed vintage Bubblebacks reaching into the USD 15,000–25,000 range when hammered.

	<span id="case-number-observations"></span>		<span id="case-number-observations"></span>

Admin: Strip Chevalier (Colin A. White is not a pseudonym; remove confusing label)

2026-04-27T04:33:20Z

Strip Chevalier (Colin A. White is not a pseudonym; remove confusing label)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:33, 27 April 2026
Line 153:		Line 153:

	== Sources ==		== Sources ==
	* The Vintage Rolex Field Manual~~, Chevalier Edition~~ — ~~unknown~~, Morning Tundra		* ''The Vintage Rolex Field Manual'' — Colin A. White, Morning Tundra
	* [https://www.windvintage.com/rolex-oyster-perpetual-bubbleback-reference-3131 Wind Vintage — Rolex Oyster Perpetual Bubbleback Reference 3131] — Wind Vintage		* [https://www.windvintage.com/rolex-oyster-perpetual-bubbleback-reference-3131 Wind Vintage — Rolex Oyster Perpetual Bubbleback Reference 3131] — Wind Vintage
	* [https://www.windvintage.com/blog/how-rolex-became-rolex-the-automatic-perpetual-movement-part-2 Wind Vintage — How Rolex Became Rolex: The Automatic Perpetual Movement Part 2] — Charlie Dunne / Wind Vintage, Wind Vintage		* [https://www.windvintage.com/blog/how-rolex-became-rolex-the-automatic-perpetual-movement-part-2 Wind Vintage — How Rolex Became Rolex: The Automatic Perpetual Movement Part 2] — Charlie Dunne / Wind Vintage, Wind Vintage