<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://bezelbase.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Reference%3A2240</id>
	<title>Reference:2240 - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://bezelbase.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Reference%3A2240"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://bezelbase.org/index.php?title=Reference:2240&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-08-23T03:14:12Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.42.7</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://bezelbase.org/index.php?title=Reference:2240&amp;diff=7784&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Admin: Add DISPLAYTITLE</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://bezelbase.org/index.php?title=Reference:2240&amp;diff=7784&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2026-08-22T22:46:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Add DISPLAYTITLE&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122;&quot; data-mw=&quot;interface&quot;&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-content&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-content&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;tr class=&quot;diff-title&quot; lang=&quot;en&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;← Older revision&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;Revision as of 22:46, 22 August 2026&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot; id=&quot;mw-diff-left-l1&quot;&gt;Line 1:&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot;&gt;Line 1:&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-side-deleted&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;{{DISPLAYTITLE:Rolex 2240 Bubbleback}}&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;The 2240 is a self-winding Oyster Perpetual in a 32mm stainless steel tonneau case, and it is&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;The 2240 is a self-winding Oyster Perpetual in a 32mm stainless steel tonneau case, and it is&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;the one reference in its cohort that still has a claim to the Bubbleback name once the&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;the one reference in its cohort that still has a claim to the Bubbleback name once the&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;

&lt;!-- diff cache key mediawiki:diff:1.41:old-7783:rev-7784:php=table --&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Admin</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://bezelbase.org/index.php?title=Reference:2240&amp;diff=7783&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Admin: Import reference 2240 article</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://bezelbase.org/index.php?title=Reference:2240&amp;diff=7783&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2026-08-22T22:46:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Import reference 2240 article&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;The 2240 is a self-winding Oyster Perpetual in a 32mm stainless steel tonneau case, and it is&lt;br /&gt;
the one reference in its cohort that still has a claim to the Bubbleback name once the&lt;br /&gt;
evidence is checked. The collector list that put the 2240 into circulation also lists the 1873&lt;br /&gt;
and the 2765, and both of those turn out to be hand-wound flat-back Oysters wearing the&lt;br /&gt;
Bubbleback&amp;#039;s case but none of its mechanics. The 2240 is different: both Antiquorum examples&lt;br /&gt;
are described as centre-second and self-winding, on a 9¾-ligne movement, which is the size&lt;br /&gt;
Rolex used for its automatic Perpetual calibers and not the 10 to 10½ lignes of the manual&lt;br /&gt;
flatbacks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The thing the nickname actually refers to went undocumented for thirty years. Neither 1995&lt;br /&gt;
catalogue says whether the caseback is domed, and neither of their photographs shows it. A third&lt;br /&gt;
example surfaced in March 2026 at a general auctioneer in Nottingham, catalogued as a ref.&lt;br /&gt;
2240 and photographed from the back, and that back is domed. It is the first image of a 2240&lt;br /&gt;
caseback in the public record. It is also one non-specialist house&amp;#039;s attribution on a watch&lt;br /&gt;
whose dial reads only Rolex Oyster, without the Perpetual signature both Antiquorum examples&lt;br /&gt;
carry, which strengthens the Bubbleback reading without closing it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is still, by some distance, the least seen watch in the group. Three lots exist in the&lt;br /&gt;
public record: two Antiquorum sales in 1995 and one English provincial sale in 2026.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ref 2240 hero.webp|thumb|right|250px|alt=Rolex 2240 Oyster Perpetual with mat silver dial and applied gold indexes|Mat silver dial with applied gold indexes, the Geneva lot]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Core facts==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! detail&lt;br /&gt;
! value&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| reference&lt;br /&gt;
| 2240&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| family&lt;br /&gt;
| Bubbleback (Oyster Perpetual)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| production&lt;br /&gt;
| 1930s or 1940s; catalogues disagree, no firm years documented&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| case diameter&lt;br /&gt;
| 32mm&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| case shape&lt;br /&gt;
| tonneau&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| case&lt;br /&gt;
| polished and satined, screwed back and crown, waterproof&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| caseback profile&lt;br /&gt;
| domed, coin-edged screw-down back on the 2026 Arthur Johnson example; neither 1995 catalogue states it and neither 1995 photograph shows it&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| bezel&lt;br /&gt;
| smooth, polished&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| crystal&lt;br /&gt;
| acrylic&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| crown&lt;br /&gt;
| screw-down&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| winding&lt;br /&gt;
| self-winding&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| seconds&lt;br /&gt;
| centre seconds&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| movement&lt;br /&gt;
| 9¾ lignes, rhodium-plated, 19 jewels, lever escapement, monometallic balance, self-compensating Breguet balance-spring. No caliber number published&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| case materials&lt;br /&gt;
| stainless steel (all three documented examples)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| dials documented&lt;br /&gt;
| mat silver with applied gold indexes; mat silver with painted Arabic numerals, bâton radium hands on both; silvered sector dial with applied Roman numerals and gilt leaf hands&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| dial designations&lt;br /&gt;
| &amp;quot;Oyster Perpetual, Superlative Chronometer, Officially Certified&amp;quot;; &amp;quot;Oyster Perpetual Chronomètre&amp;quot;; &amp;quot;Rolex Oyster&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Where it sits in the line==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two details separate the 2240 from the Bubblebacks that get written about. It has centre&lt;br /&gt;
seconds rather than the sub-seconds register at six o&amp;#039;clock that the earliest Perpetuals&lt;br /&gt;
carried, and it has nineteen jewels against the seventeen of the Cal. 520 and Cal. 620&lt;br /&gt;
families that powered the reference&amp;#039;s better-known neighbours.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That combination places it later in the Bubbleback story than the 1933-era three-piece watches&lt;br /&gt;
and squarely among the mature automatics — the generation running on the two-piece Oyster case&lt;br /&gt;
that arrived in 1936 with the 3131 and 3132. Centre-seconds Perpetuals of this era are well&lt;br /&gt;
attested elsewhere in the family; catalogued 2940 examples carry &amp;quot;luminous filled sword hands,&lt;br /&gt;
center seconds&amp;quot;, so the layout is not anomalous for the period. It is simply not the layout&lt;br /&gt;
most people picture when they hear Bubbleback.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where exactly the 2240 falls inside that window is the problem, and the two surviving lots&lt;br /&gt;
make it worse rather than better. Antiquorum dated its Geneva example to the 1940s and its&lt;br /&gt;
Hong Kong example to the 1930s, two months apart, in the same year. Both readings stand in the&lt;br /&gt;
record. The 1936 start year that circulates for the reference comes from the same unverified&lt;br /&gt;
collector list that mis-assigns its neighbours, and has no independent support behind it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Production outline==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The public record for the 2240 consists of three lots. Two are Antiquorum sales from 1995:&lt;br /&gt;
Geneva at the Hôtel des Bergues on 22 April, lot 304, and Hong Kong at the Hotel Furama&lt;br /&gt;
Kempinski on 14 June, lot 29. A full sweep of the house&amp;#039;s archive, which reaches back to 1974,&lt;br /&gt;
returns nothing else, and no lot surfaced at Phillips, Sotheby&amp;#039;s, Christie&amp;#039;s, Bonhams or&lt;br /&gt;
Heritage. The third is later and a great deal humbler: Arthur Johnson &amp;amp; Sons, a general&lt;br /&gt;
auctioneer in Nottingham, sold one as lot 7287 in a mixed Saturday sale on 14 March 2026,&lt;br /&gt;
catalogued in a single line as an Oyster Bubbleback, ref. 2240, with an automatic movement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No lot page published a case number, so no serial anchor exists and no production window can&lt;br /&gt;
be constructed from observed examples. No production figures appear in any documented source.&lt;br /&gt;
All three documented watches are stainless steel; whether Rolex built the 2240 in gold, gold&lt;br /&gt;
shell or two-tone, as it did across much of the contemporary range, is unknown.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a plausible reason the reference is so scarce in the record, offered here as&lt;br /&gt;
speculation rather than fact. Both Antiquorum sales predate the internet-era auction archives&lt;br /&gt;
that most collector research now runs on. The 2026 lot shows the other half of the problem: it&lt;br /&gt;
passed through a provincial general auctioneer, described in one line, indexed nowhere that&lt;br /&gt;
vintage Rolex collectors habitually look. A reference can stay invisible by selling in the&lt;br /&gt;
wrong century or in the wrong room.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Movement notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nine and three-quarter lignes, rhodium-plated, nineteen jewels, lever escapement,&lt;br /&gt;
monometallic balance, self-compensating Breguet balance-spring, self-winding, centre seconds.&lt;br /&gt;
Both Antiquorum catalogues give that specification word for word, independently, on opposite&lt;br /&gt;
sides of the world and two months apart.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ligne size is the most useful number in the description, because it is the one that&lt;br /&gt;
places the watch. Nine and three-quarter lignes is the size of Rolex&amp;#039;s automatic Perpetual&lt;br /&gt;
movements — the lineage running from the Cal. 520 of 1933 through the 620 and its&lt;br /&gt;
sweep-seconds successors. The manual-wind flat-back Oysters Rolex was building alongside them&lt;br /&gt;
run larger, at 10 to 10½ lignes; all three documented examples of the neighbouring ref 2765&lt;br /&gt;
measure in that range. The 2240&amp;#039;s movement therefore sits inside the automatic family on its&lt;br /&gt;
dimensions alone, which is independent corroboration of the self-winding descriptions rather&lt;br /&gt;
than a restatement of them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Neither catalogue names a caliber, and this article does not supply one. The 19-jewel&lt;br /&gt;
centre-seconds configuration is architecturally distinct from the 17-jewel sub-seconds Cal.&lt;br /&gt;
520 and Cal. 620 that powered the earlier Bubblebacks, and it would be easy to reason from&lt;br /&gt;
that to a specific sweep-seconds caliber. No documented source makes that attribution for the&lt;br /&gt;
# The ligne size, the jewel count, the escapement, the balance and the seconds layout are&lt;br /&gt;
what the record supports.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Dial map==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ref 2240 dial-variant-painted-arabic.webp|thumb|right|250px|alt=Rolex 2240 mat silver dial with painted Arabic numerals at every hour|Painted Arabic numerals and outer minute track, the Hong Kong lot]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Three dials are documented, one per lot, and the sale photographs confirm all three.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Geneva example carries a mat silver dial with applied gold indexes and radium-filled&lt;br /&gt;
bâton hands, reading Oyster Perpetual below the coronet and carrying its chronometer&lt;br /&gt;
designation above six o&amp;#039;clock. The Hong Kong example is the more obviously pre-war of the&lt;br /&gt;
two: mat silver again, but with painted Arabic numerals at every hour, an outer minute track&lt;br /&gt;
with five-minute markers, Chronomètre above six, and the same radium-filled bâton hands.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ref 2240 dial-variant-roman.webp|thumb|right|250px|alt=Rolex 2240 silvered sector dial with applied Roman numerals and gilt leaf hands|Applied Roman numerals on a sector-style dial signed Rolex Oyster, the Nottingham lot]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Nottingham watch is the outlier, and the way it differs matters more than the way it&lt;br /&gt;
looks. Its dial is silvered with a faint sector pattern, applied Roman numerals at the even&lt;br /&gt;
hours and applied batons at the odd ones, a printed outer minute track, gilt leaf hands and a&lt;br /&gt;
centre seconds hand. The surface is heavily crazed and plainly unrestored. What it does not&lt;br /&gt;
carry is the word Perpetual: the signature reads Rolex Oyster and nothing else, where both&lt;br /&gt;
Antiquorum dials name the watch an Oyster Perpetual and give a chronometer designation.&lt;br /&gt;
Rolex&amp;#039;s self-winding watches of this period almost always say so on the dial, so an original&lt;br /&gt;
Rolex Oyster dial on a watch sold as an automatic 2240 is a genuine discrepancy and is&lt;br /&gt;
recorded here as one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Applied indexes against painted Arabics is a real stylistic split and not a cataloguing quirk,&lt;br /&gt;
and it maps onto the two dating readings the catalogues give: the painted-Arabic Hong Kong&lt;br /&gt;
watch reads as the earlier of the pair. Three examples is not enough to call that a production&lt;br /&gt;
sequence, but it is enough to say the reference was built with more than one dial treatment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One detail on the Geneva dial deserves a flag rather than a conclusion. Its lot title gives&lt;br /&gt;
the designation as Superlative Chronometer, Officially Certified, wording generally associated&lt;br /&gt;
with a later period than the 1940s that the same lot assigns the watch. That could point to a&lt;br /&gt;
later example, a replacement dial, or simply Antiquorum paraphrasing in the title. The&lt;br /&gt;
chronology of Rolex&amp;#039;s shift between the two chronometer designations has not been checked&lt;br /&gt;
against independent sources here, so nothing is concluded from it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Case, bezel, crystal, and crown==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stainless steel, tonneau-shaped, 32mm, polished and satin-finished, with screwed back and&lt;br /&gt;
screw-down crown. Smooth polished bezel and an acrylic crystal, as the era requires. The Hong&lt;br /&gt;
Kong catalogue adds one word the Geneva one does not: it calls the case massive, Antiquorum&amp;#039;s&lt;br /&gt;
term for a case with real substance to it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The caseback was the open question for thirty years, and it is the one that matters most.&lt;br /&gt;
Neither 1995 catalogue states whether it is domed. Both give the case description in full and&lt;br /&gt;
both stop at &amp;quot;screwed back and crown&amp;quot;. The two Antiquorum photographs are front three-quarter&lt;br /&gt;
views on leather straps, and neither shows the back at all.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ref 2240 caseback.webp|thumb|right|300px|alt=Domed coin-edged screw-down caseback of a Rolex 2240 on a black leather strap|The domed, coin-edged screw-down back of the Nottingham example, the first 2240 caseback photographed in the public record]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Nottingham sale turned the watch over. Its fifth photograph is a caseback view, and the&lt;br /&gt;
back is a pronounced dome seated inside a coin-edged screw ring, the profile the nickname&lt;br /&gt;
describes. The crown stands proud of the case in the same frame, which fits the one condition&lt;br /&gt;
note the lot carried: the crown would not screw down and wanted attention.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That earlier silence was never as damning as it looked, because the catalogues of the period&lt;br /&gt;
do not describe caseback doming even when the watch is unambiguously a Bubbleback. Christie&amp;#039;s&lt;br /&gt;
catalogued a ref 2764 as an Oyster Perpetual Bubble Back in the lot title and then described&lt;br /&gt;
it in body text as a 9¾-ligne, 19-jewel, sweep-seconds movement in a two-part 32mm case with a&lt;br /&gt;
domed crystal and a screw-down back and crown. The only thing domed in that description is the&lt;br /&gt;
crystal. Strip the title away and it reads exactly like the two Antiquorum 2240 lots. The formula does&lt;br /&gt;
not discriminate, which means the 2240&amp;#039;s description is consistent with a Bubbleback and&lt;br /&gt;
simply fails to settle the question.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Everything else points the same way. That Christie&amp;#039;s 2764 specification — 9¾ lignes, nineteen&lt;br /&gt;
jewels, sweep seconds, 32mm, screw-down back — is the 2240&amp;#039;s specification line for line. And&lt;br /&gt;
the flat-backed automatics that make self-winding an insufficient test are a later development&lt;br /&gt;
in the 6000-series references, arriving once Rolex had slimmed the calibers enough to drop the&lt;br /&gt;
bulge. A 32mm self-winding tonneau Oyster running a 9¾-ligne movement in the late 1930s or&lt;br /&gt;
1940s sits before that change.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So the reasonable reading is that the 2240 is a Bubbleback, and there is now a photograph of a&lt;br /&gt;
domed back on a watch catalogued as one. The reading is better supported than it was and still&lt;br /&gt;
short of settled. That photograph comes from a general auctioneer running a mixed Saturday&lt;br /&gt;
sale, not from a watch specialist; no case number was published to anchor the attribution&lt;br /&gt;
independently; and the same watch wears a Rolex Oyster dial without the Perpetual signature&lt;br /&gt;
both Antiquorum examples carry. A specialist cataloguing of that watch, or a case number,&lt;br /&gt;
would close the question.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bracelets, end links, and clasps==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nothing is documented. Neither lot was sold on a Rolex bracelet, and no period fitment for the&lt;br /&gt;
reference appears anywhere in the surfaced record.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Auction record==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Venue&lt;br /&gt;
! Date&lt;br /&gt;
! Lot&lt;br /&gt;
! Dated by catalogue&lt;br /&gt;
! Dial&lt;br /&gt;
! Estimate&lt;br /&gt;
! Result&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Antiquorum, Geneva (Hôtel des Bergues)&lt;br /&gt;
| 1995-04-22&lt;br /&gt;
| 304&lt;br /&gt;
| 1940s&lt;br /&gt;
| Mat silver, applied gold indexes, bâton radium hands&lt;br /&gt;
| CHF 2,600–2,800 (USD 2,200–2,400)&lt;br /&gt;
| Not published&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Antiquorum, Hong Kong (Hotel Furama Kempinski)&lt;br /&gt;
| 1995-06-14&lt;br /&gt;
| 29&lt;br /&gt;
| 1930s&lt;br /&gt;
| Mat silver, painted Arabic numerals, bâton radium hands&lt;br /&gt;
| HKD 15,000–18,000 (USD 2,000–2,200)&lt;br /&gt;
| Not published&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Arthur Johnson &amp;amp; Sons, Nottingham (The Saturday Auctions)&lt;br /&gt;
| 2026-03-14&lt;br /&gt;
| 7287&lt;br /&gt;
| Not dated&lt;br /&gt;
| Silvered sector, applied Roman numerals, gilt leaf hands&lt;br /&gt;
| Not published&lt;br /&gt;
| GBP 680 hammer&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Neither Antiquorum lot page carries a realised price, so for thirty years the reference had no&lt;br /&gt;
auction result on record at all. What it had instead was two estimates set within about ten&lt;br /&gt;
percent of each other by the same house in the same year, on two continents, roughly USD&lt;br /&gt;
2,000–2,400 either way. The single realised figure the reference now has is the GBP 680 hammer&lt;br /&gt;
at Nottingham in 2026, which prices a worn, unrestored watch with a crown fault in a sale that&lt;br /&gt;
was not looking for a Rolex collector. Three data points spread over thirty-one years, two of&lt;br /&gt;
them unrealised estimates, do not describe a market, and no attempt to read one is made here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What the three lots do establish is narrower and more useful: that the reference exists, that&lt;br /&gt;
the two specialist-catalogued examples are self-winding on a 9¾-ligne movement with centre&lt;br /&gt;
seconds and nineteen jewels in a 32mm steel case, that it appeared with at least three dial&lt;br /&gt;
treatments, and that a watch catalogued as a 2240 has a domed back.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Related references ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Reference:2764|Bubbleback 2764]] — Cal. 620N &amp;quot;Super Precision&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Reference:2940|Bubbleback 2940]] — centre-seconds contemporary&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Reference:3131|Bubbleback 3131]] — the 1936 two-piece case transition&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Reference:2765|Oyster Chronometer 2765]] — the manual flat-back that shares the list but not the mechanics&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Reference:1873|Oyster Royal 1873]] — manual flat-back Oyster&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See also the [[Reference:bubbleback|Bubbleback family index]], [[Reference:Movements|movement reference]], [[Reference:Bracelets|bracelet &amp;amp; clasp guide]], and [[Reference:Serial-numbers|serial numbers by year]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sources ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://catalog.antiquorum.swiss/en/lots/rolex-lot-118-304 &amp;quot;Rolex Oyster Perpetual, Superlative Chronometer, Officially Certified, Ref. 2240&amp;quot;, Antiquorum, 1995-04-22]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://catalog.antiquorum.swiss/en/lots/rolex-lot-120-29 &amp;quot;Rolex Oyster Perpetual Chronometre, Ref. 2240&amp;quot;, Antiquorum, 1995-06-14]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.arthurjohnson.co.uk/catalogue/lot/666399e1d8d806483b36d5f21241ba50/1d509dfe86f02da2d7cbda445ef6ff1f/the-saturday-auctions-14th-march-2026/ &amp;quot;Rolex - an Oyster &amp;#039;Bubbleback&amp;#039; wristwatch, ref. 2240, stainless steel case, automatic movement&amp;quot;, Arthur Johnson &amp;amp; Sons, 2026-03-14]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.hodinkee.com/articles/the-rolex-bubbleback-and-why-it-still-matters &amp;quot;Buying, Selling, &amp;amp; Collecting: The Rolex Bubbleback And Why It Still Matters&amp;quot;, Hodinkee]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://robbreport.com/style/watch-collector/lists/rolex-bubbleback-watches-collector-guide-1931-1950s-1235893131/ &amp;quot;A Collector&amp;#039;s Guide to Rolex Bubbleback Watches, From 1931 to the 1950s&amp;quot;, Robb Report]&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;List of Bubbleback models (user w-v-m)&amp;quot;, RolexForums&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.christies.com/en/lot/lot-5091681 &amp;quot;ROLEX, OYSTER PERPETUAL BUBBLE BACK REF. 2764 CALIFORNIA DIAL, STAINLESS STEEL SELF-WINDING WRISTWATCH WITH SWEEP SECONDS&amp;quot;, Christie&amp;#039;s]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/watch-review/rolex-bubble-back.html &amp;quot;Rolex Bubble Back History: A Comprehensive Collector&amp;#039;s Guide&amp;quot;, Bob&amp;#039;s Watches]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Bubbleback]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:References]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Admin</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>