Reference:114060 - Revision history

Admin: SEO: clickable title + og:image + timestamps

2026-06-29T01:15:32Z

SEO: clickable title + og:image + timestamps

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:15, 29 June 2026
Line 9:		Line 9:
	\|og_type=article		\|og_type=article
	\|published_time=2026-04-14T16:12:46Z		\|published_time=2026-04-14T16:12:46Z
	\|modified_time=2026-06-~~22T16~~:00:~~37Z~~		\|modified_time=2026-06-29T01:14:10Z
	\|robots=index,follow,max-image-preview:large		\|robots=index,follow,max-image-preview:large
	}}		}}

Admin: SEO: clickable title + og:image + timestamps

2026-06-29T01:14:10Z

SEO: clickable title + og:image + timestamps

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:14, 29 June 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{DISPLAYTITLE:Rolex 114060 Submariner}}		{{DISPLAYTITLE:Rolex 114060 Submariner}}
	{{#seo:		{{#seo:
	\|title=Rolex 114060 ~~Submariner~~ — Production, Dial ~~Variants, Serial Ranges~~ \| BezelBase		\|title=Rolex Submariner 114060 (2012–2020) — Production & Dial Guide \| BezelBase
	\|description=The 114060 is the last 40mm no-date Submariner. Rolex introduced it at Baselworld 2012 and kept it in production until about 2020, when the 124060 arrived…		\|description=The 114060 is the last 40mm no-date Submariner. Rolex introduced it at Baselworld 2012 and kept it in production until about 2020, when the 124060 arrived…
	\|keywords=Rolex, 114060, Submariner, specifications, reference guide		\|keywords=Rolex, 114060, Submariner, specifications, reference guide
Line 9:		Line 9:
	\|og_type=article		\|og_type=article
	\|published_time=2026-04-14T16:12:46Z		\|published_time=2026-04-14T16:12:46Z
	\|modified_time=2026-04-~~29T02~~:45:~~46Z~~		\|modified_time=2026-06-22T16:00:37Z
	\|robots=index,follow,max-image-preview:large		\|robots=index,follow,max-image-preview:large
	}}		}}

Admin: Voice: rephrase rhetorical negation-opener to a direct statement (slop-cop sweep)

2026-06-22T16:00:37Z

Voice: rephrase rhetorical negation-opener to a direct statement (slop-cop sweep)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:00, 22 June 2026
Line 179:		Line 179:
	== Collector perspective: "the last small Sub" ==		== Collector perspective: "the last small Sub" ==

	The 114060 ~~was not always the~~ collector favorite ~~it has become~~. During its production run it lived in the shadow of the 116610LN and 116610LV, because the Glidelock and Cerachrom were bigger news on the date line, and because the 116610LV's green dial was a conversation piece. The 114060 registered as the quiet one in the family.		The 114060 became a collector favorite only with time. During its production run it lived in the shadow of the 116610LN and 116610LV, because the Glidelock and Cerachrom were bigger news on the date line, and because the 116610LV's green dial was a conversation piece. The 114060 registered as the quiet one in the family.

	Discontinuation in 2020 reframed the reference. When the 124060 grew to 41mm, collectors understood that the 40mm no-date Submariner was gone — the size that had defined the Submariner for decades now lived only in discontinued references. The 114060 became the last small Sub. Wrists that found the 124060 slightly too large turned back to the 114060 and found exactly the proportions they wanted.		Discontinuation in 2020 reframed the reference. When the 124060 grew to 41mm, collectors understood that the 40mm no-date Submariner was gone — the size that had defined the Submariner for decades now lived only in discontinued references. The 114060 became the last small Sub. Wrists that found the 124060 slightly too large turned back to the 114060 and found exactly the proportions they wanted.

Admin: SEO: capitalize schema.org @type to "Article" for rich-result eligibility

2026-06-04T04:37:46Z

SEO: capitalize schema.org @type to "Article" for rich-result eligibility

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:37, 4 June 2026
Line 6:		Line 6:
	\|image=Ref 114060 hero.webp		\|image=Ref 114060 hero.webp
	\|image_alt=Rolex Submariner Ref. 114060		\|image_alt=Rolex Submariner Ref. 114060
	\|type=~~article~~		\|type=Article
	\|og_type=article		\|og_type=article
	\|published_time=2026-04-14T16:12:46Z		\|published_time=2026-04-14T16:12:46Z

Admin: Remove Category:Working Draft — published pre-2020 in-scope reference

2026-05-31T02:06:23Z

Remove Category:Working Draft — published pre-2020 in-scope reference

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:06, 31 May 2026
Line 209:		Line 209:

	[[Category:Submariner]]		[[Category:Submariner]]
	~~[[Category:Working Draft]]~~

Admin: Add DISPLAYTITLE: drop NS_REFERENCE prefix from H1 (SEO/UX, site-wide pass)

2026-05-31T01:43:06Z

Add DISPLAYTITLE: drop NS_REFERENCE prefix from H1 (SEO/UX, site-wide pass)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:43, 31 May 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{DISPLAYTITLE:Rolex 114060 Submariner}}
	{{#seo:		{{#seo:
	\|title=Rolex 114060 Submariner — Production, Dial Variants, Serial Ranges \| BezelBase		\|title=Rolex 114060 Submariner — Production, Dial Variants, Serial Ranges \| BezelBase

Klaudiusz: [bot-audit] proposal #22 ref=114060 agents=researcher,auditor,image_scout,bar_raiser (FlaggedRevs pending review)

2026-05-30T05:45:41Z

[bot-audit] proposal #22 ref=114060 agents=researcher,auditor,image_scout,bar_raiser (FlaggedRevs pending review)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:45, 30 May 2026
Line 110:		Line 110:
	=== The 2-line question ===		=== The 2-line question ===

	The 114060 carries ~~a 2-line~~ dial: "SUBMARINER" ~~and~~ the depth rating. ~~There is~~ no ~~chronometer text~~, ~~a deliberate~~ return to the clean ~~layout~~ the ~~14060M had left behind with its 4-liner "Superlative Chronometer Officially Certified~~." The 114060 is COSC-certified but does not announce the fact on the dial. That places it in an unusual position in Submariner history: the original 14060 carried a 2-line dial because it was not COSC-certified; the late 14060M carried a 4-line dial because it was certified and Rolex wanted to say so; the 114060 carries a 2-line dial despite being certified. The layout is a design choice, not a specification limitation.		The 114060 carries four lines of lower dial text: "SUBMARINER," the depth rating, and "SUPERLATIVE CHRONOMETER OFFICIALLY CERTIFIED." It keeps the symmetrical no-date layout, but it does not return to the sparse 2-line lower dial of the original 14060 or early 14060M. The clean look comes from the absence of a date window and Cyclops, not from the absence of chronometer text. The 114060 is COSC-certified but does not announce the fact on the dial. That places it in an unusual position in Submariner history: the original 14060 carried a 2-line dial because it was not COSC-certified; the late 14060M carried a 4-line dial because it was certified and Rolex wanted to say so; the 114060 carries a 2-line dial despite being certified. The layout is a design choice, not a specification limitation.

	For collectors who care about dial typography, the 114060 is the modern reference that most closely echoes the spare look of the original 14060 — a COSC-grade movement sitting behind a visually uncluttered face.		For collectors who care about dial typography, the 114060 is the modern reference that most closely echoes the spare look of the original 14060 — a COSC-grade movement sitting behind a visually uncluttered face.
Line 123:		Line 123:

	The case is 40mm 904L stainless steel in the Maxi format — wider lugs and more pronounced crown guards than the slim five-digit case used on the 14060 and 14060M, about 12.5mm thick with a 48mm lug-to-lug span, and no drilled lug holes.		The case is 40mm 904L stainless steel in the Maxi format — wider lugs and more pronounced crown guards than the slim five-digit case used on the 14060 and 14060M, about 12.5mm thick with a 48mm lug-to-lug span, and no drilled lug holes.

			The finishing leans modern: brushed top surfaces with mirror-polished case flanks, the polished sides catching light along the wider lugs.

	The same 40mm diameter does not translate to the same wrist feel. The Maxi Case is larger and heavier; the wider lugs spread the visual footprint; the crown guards read as more substantial. Some collectors prefer the heft and presence. Others miss the slimmer five-digit proportions. That preference split is one reason the 114060 has become collectible — it is the last Submariner to offer this 40mm Maxi case before Rolex moved the line to 41mm.		The same 40mm diameter does not translate to the same wrist feel. The Maxi Case is larger and heavier; the wider lugs spread the visual footprint; the crown guards read as more substantial. Some collectors prefer the heft and presence. Others miss the slimmer five-digit proportions. That preference split is one reason the 114060 has become collectible — it is the last Submariner to offer this 40mm Maxi case before Rolex moved the line to 41mm.

Admin: Resize hero: 340px -> 250px

2026-04-30T04:20:35Z

Resize hero: 340px -> 250px

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:20, 30 April 2026
Line 22:		Line 22:
	<span id="core-facts"></span>		<span id="core-facts"></span>

	[[File:Ref 114060 hero.webp\|thumb\|right\|~~340px~~\|alt=Rolex Submariner Ref. 114060\|Rolex Submariner Ref. 114060]]		[[File:Ref 114060 hero.webp\|thumb\|right\|250px\|alt=Rolex Submariner Ref. 114060\|Rolex Submariner Ref. 114060]]

	== Core facts ==		== Core facts ==

Admin: SEO: og:image + image_alt + og_type + timestamps

2026-04-29T03:18:22Z

SEO: og:image + image_alt + og_type + timestamps

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:18, 29 April 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{#seo:		{{#seo:
	\|title=Rolex Submariner ~~114060~~ — BezelBase		\|title=Rolex 114060 Submariner — Production, Dial Variants, Serial Ranges \| BezelBase
	\|description=The 114060 is the last 40mm no-date Submariner. Rolex introduced it at Baselworld 2012 and kept it in production until about 2020, when the 124060 arrived…		\|description=The 114060 is the last 40mm no-date Submariner. Rolex introduced it at Baselworld 2012 and kept it in production until about 2020, when the 124060 arrived…
	\|keywords=Rolex, 114060, Submariner, specifications, reference guide		\|keywords=Rolex, 114060, Submariner, specifications, reference guide
Line 8:		Line 8:
	\|og_type=article		\|og_type=article
	\|published_time=2026-04-14T16:12:46Z		\|published_time=2026-04-14T16:12:46Z
	\|modified_time=2026-04-29T02:31:~~36Z~~		\|modified_time=2026-04-29T02:45:46Z
	\|robots=index,follow,max-image-preview:large		\|robots=index,follow,max-image-preview:large
	}}		}}

Admin: SEO: og:image + image_alt + og_type + timestamps

2026-04-29T02:45:46Z

SEO: og:image + image_alt + og_type + timestamps

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:45, 29 April 2026
Line 8:		Line 8:
	\|og_type=article		\|og_type=article
	\|published_time=2026-04-14T16:12:46Z		\|published_time=2026-04-14T16:12:46Z
	\|modified_time=2026-04-~~27T13~~:27:~~30Z~~		\|modified_time=2026-04-29T02:31:36Z
	\|robots=index,follow,max-image-preview:large		\|robots=index,follow,max-image-preview:large
	}}		}}